Performing a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation can generally be divided into three stages: pre-processing, setting up and running the solver, and post-processing. The pre-processing stage consists of defining the computational domain and discretizing it with a mesh. Next, the solver is configured to reflect the physics of the problem and run in order to obtain a solution, which is, in general, a three-dimensional time-dependent dataset. At the post-processing stage, the produced solution is analysed. This includes both extracting relevant data (e.g. pressure or velocity values at certain locations) and visualizing it with different types of plots.
Focusing on the post-processing stage, there is a large variety of tools providing associated functionality. Indeed, most CFD software packages, while concentrating on solvers, usually also provide means for conducting basic post-processing. For example, routines for extracting data along a cut-plane or a line are commonly present, as well as the possibility for producing different types of plots (scatter plots, vector plots, streamline plots etc). Specialized software for post-processing exists as well, and typically provides a richer functionality, better performance, and higher-quality rendering. However, the existing solutions tend to:
Indeed, the properties above reflect the average post-processing needs of the users. Nevertheless, there are many situations when a different sort of tool is required. While the absolute majority of CFD datasets are, in fact, three-dimensional, and many are also time-dependent, it is hard to analyse such data as is. Commonly, time-averaging is applied along with plane- or line-data extraction, and the actual analysis and visualization are thus performed on data of lower dimension. Fine-grain plot customization may not be needed in most applications but is an absolute must when producing figures for publications. Finally, interactivity is important when looking at a single case for the first time, but being able to quickly reproduce the analysis or apply it to a new dataset becomes increasingly important in larger simulation campaigns.
It would, therefore, be beneficial to have a complementary post-processing tool that excels at performing easily reproducible analyses of two-dimensional datasets as well as producing high-quality customizable visualizations. The focus of this work is presenting such a tool, namely, a Python package called turbulucid. By combining data manipulation functionality provided by the Visualization Toolkit (VTK)  and plotting routines available in matplotlib , turbulucid allows to produce publication-quality plots of several types and provides functionality for analysing the dataset with a set of data extraction routines. Using the package, the post-processing can be scripted in Python using the provided objects and functions. This makes it easy to analyse a large set of simulations in a structured way or quickly apply an existing analysis to a new case. Additionally, users have the possibility to use any of the numerous packages available in the Python ecosystem in their analysis.
While the package works exclusively with planar two-dimensional datasets, no assumption is made regarding the topology of the computational mesh, meaning that any mesh consisting of polygonal cells can be used. The data itself is assumed to be stored in a format for unstructured meshes defined by VTK, but the package is designed to be easily extendible to read data in other formats. Scalar, vector and tensorial quantities are supported.
The discussion of the features of turbulucid, as well as its design and implementation, is continued in the sections below. Examples of applying turbulucid to post-processing of simulations of various flows can be found in [3, 4, 5, 6]. This includes flat-plate turbulent boundary layer flow, flow around a ship hull, and also flow around a submarine-like axisymmetric body. Here, the functionality of turbulucid is demonstrated by applying it to post-processing a simulation of a flow over a backward-facing step.
As it was mentioned in the introduction, turbulucid uses Python bindings for VTK to handle the unstructured mesh and matplotlib’s plotting routines for producing plots. It is important to note that the user is never exposed to VTK objects, therefore familiarity with VTK’s API is not a prerequisite for using turbulucid. All data is instead returned to the user as numpy  arrays.
By contrast, the constructed plots are returned to the user as objects of the appropriate type defined by matplotlib (e.g. a StreamPlotSet object for a streamline plot.) This allows for customizing the created plots.
To open a dataset, the user has to create a Case object. The path to the dataset is passed to the constructor. Once created, the methods and attributes of the Case object provide access to the dataset. For example, the _getitem_ operator is overloaded to return the values of a field present in the dataset, given the field’s name.
To make turbulucid easily extendible to work with datasets saved in various formats, a separate hierarchy of classes responsible for reading the data is present. Currently, readers for legacy and XML VTK data files (extensions .vtk and .vtu, respectively) are implemented, the corresponding classes being LegacyReader and XMLReader. Both implemented readers are derived from Reader, which serves as a base abstract class. The Case class determines which Reader-class should be used based on the extension of the file the dataset is stored in.
Internally, the dataset is stored as vtkPolyData. Note that this and other VTK formats support data of two types: cell and point. The former associates a value with each polygonal cell whereas the latter associates a value with each mesh-node. In turbulucid, the fields are assumed to be stored as cell data. If point data is stored instead, the readers perform linear interpolation in order to produce corresponding cell data.
To reduce the amount of boilerplate code that has to be written by the user, object-oriented programming is not used for implementing the plotting and data extraction features. Instead, they are implemented as functions, which commonly require a Case object as an input parameter. The provided functions and their purpose are summarized in Tables 1 and 2.
|plot_field||Each cell is colored with the corresponding value of a given scalar field.|
|plot_vectors||Arrows showing the magnitude and direction of a vector field.|
|plot_streamlines||Streamlines following a vector field.|
|plot_boundaries||Lines showing the boundaries of the geometry.|
|add_colorbar||Adds a colorbar.|
|profile_along_line||Extract data along a line.|
|sample_by_plane||Re-sample the dataset using a Cartesian grid.|
|dist||Compute distances from centres of boundary-adjacent cells to the boundary.|
|normals||Compute unit outward normals to every edge of a given boundary.|
|tangents||Compute unit tangent vectors to every edge of a given boundary.|
The package is documented using numpy-style docstrings. The Sphinx package is used to compile them into html.1
In this section turbulucid is used to post-process results from a simulation of a flow over a backward-facing step (BFS).2 The goal is to demonstrate the quality of some of the plot types turbulucid can be used to produce. The analysis of the flow as such is therefore kept at a superficial level. For completeness, it is noted that the results were obtained by conducting a large-eddy simulation of the flow using the open-source CFD software OpenFOAM . The unknowns were averaged in time in the course of the simulation and then also across the statistically homogeneous spanwise direction, thus producing a two-dimensional dataset.
To show the computational domain, the function plot_boundaries can be used. It is possible to scale the x and y axis. In the case of the BFS, it is common to use the step-height, h, as a scaling parameter. We can also use matplotlib to add annotations to the figure to indicate what boundary conditions are used, as well as add axes labels, see Figure 1. This example clearly illustrates how turbulucid seamlessly integrates with matplotlib allowing the user to take full advantage of this library.
To get a good qualitative understanding of the flow, let us plot the distribution of the wall-parallel component of velocity across the geometry. To this end, the function plot_field can be used, and add_colorbar can be used to add a colorbar to the plot, see Figure 2.
The code used to produce Figure 2 is given in Listing 1. First, the data is opened by creating a Case object. Then the step-height, h, is defined, followed by a call to the plot_field function that creates the plot. Several arguments are passed to plot_field. The created Case object is the first argument. The second argument is a numpy array of values to be plotted. The array is retrieved from the Case object by passing the name of the desired field (here UMean, i.e. the mean velocity) to the _getitem_ operator. Finally, the keyword arguments scaleX and scaleY are set to h to scale the axes of the plot with the step-height. The created plot object is assigned to a variable, f. A colorbar object is then created using add_colorbar and f. The object is then manipulated to set the correct colorbar label. Finally, x- and y-labels are defined using standard functions from matplotlib.pyplot, here imported as plt.
Listing 1: Code snippet used to produce Figure 2.
case = Case(“path/to/data”) h = 0.0094318 f = plot_field(case, case[“UMean”][:,0], scaleX=h, scaleY=h) cbar = add_colorbar(f) cbar.ax.set_ylabel(r“$u/U_0$, m/s”) plt.xlabel(r“$x/h$”) plt.ylabel(r“$y/h$”)
It can be seen in Figure 2 that a boundary layer approaches the step from the left, separates, and reattaches at x/h ≈ 6. A recirculation region is formed directly downstream of the step. To investigate this region further, a vector plot can be created using the plot_vectors function, see Figure 3. Two recirculation bubbles can be observed: the main, larger, bubble and a secondary one in the corner directly downstream of the step.
Profile plots are commonly used to compare the solution with reference data, obtained computationally or experimentally. For the BFS in particular, profiles of the x component of velocity as a function of y, at different streamwise locations, can be considered. To extract data along a line the profile_along_line function can be used. It is then possible to combine plot_boundaries with matplotlib’s plot function to embed line-plots into the geometry of the computational domain, see Figure 4.
The inflection of the velocity profile is clearly seen in the separation region, at x/h = 2, whereas at x/h ≈ 6 the inflection vanishes, indicating reattachment. A recovery of a canonical turbulent boundary layer profile is observed downstream.
The framework pytest is used to test the implemented functionality with unit tests. Travis CI is used to automatically test installing the package and running all the tests, using both Python 3 and Python 2. This is performed using the Anaconda Python distribution, with the latest provided versions of the required packages. Instructions for running the tests locally are given in the package documentation. The best way to validate the functionality of the software is to apply it to post-processing a simple dataset. To that end, three datasets are shipped with turbulucid, including the BFS simulation results used here to illustrate its functionality.
The package is expected to run on any operating systems, which are supported by all the dependencies (see below). This includes but is not limited to modern Linux distributions, Windows, and Mac OS.
Turbulucid is written in Python 3, but is compatible and tested with Python 2 as well.
The following Python packages: numpy, matplotlib, scipy, pytest. VTK version 7.0.0 or higher, and the associated Python bindings. The Sphinx package is needed to build the documentation.
Name: Github release v0.2
Licence: GNU GPL version 3
Publisher: Timofey Mukha
Version published: v0.2
Date published: 16/08/2018
Licence: GNU GPL version 3
Date published: 02/03/2016
Turbulucid can be useful to all engineers and researchers working with computational fluid dynamics. In particular, when there is need for producing a publication-quality plot or performing an easily reproducible scripted analysis of a simulation campaign.
The package can be used directly with any CFD solver that supports extracting cut-plane data in VTK format. Otherwise, the data should first be converted into the appropriate format, e.g. using the VTK API. The turbulucid package itself can also be extended to read in data stored in a different format and apply appropriate conversion routines on the fly. Such contributions are most welcome, and anyone willing to extend turbulucid in this or any other way is encouraged to contact the author or open an issue in the Github repository.
A readme file, including installation instructions, is provided with the software. Additionally, a tutorial in form of a Jupyter notebook  is provided, demonstrating most of the functionality of the package. While further support cannot be guaranteed, the author will do his best to provide aid to users. Github issues can be used for asking for help.
The incentive to create turbulucid came from the need to post-process simulations conducted using computing resources provided by the Swedish National Infrastructure for Computing (SNIC). Therefore SNIC and, in particular, the PDC Center for High Performance Computing (PDC-HPC) are gratefully acknowledged.
The author has no competing interests to declare.
Hunter, J D 2007 “Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment.” In: Computing in Science & Engineering, 9(3): 90–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.55
Kluyver, T, et al. 2016 “Jupyter Notebooks — a publishing format for reproducible computational workows.” In: ELPUB, 87–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-649-1-87
Liefvendahl, M, Johansson, M and Quas, M 2017 “Grid generation for wall-modelled LES of ship hydrodynamics in model scale.” In: VII International Conference on Computational Methods in Marine Engineering, MARINE 2017, 143: 259–268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.07.055
Mukha, T, Johansson, M and Liefvendahl, M 2018 “Effect of wall-stress model and mesh-cell topology on the predictive accuracy of LES of turbulent boundary layer flows.” In: 7th European Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics. Glasgow, UK.
van Der Walt, S, Colbert, S C and Varoquaux, G 2011 “The NumPy array: A structure for effcient numerical computation.” In: Computing in Science & Engineering, 13(2): 22–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2011.37
Weller, H G, et al. 1998 “A tensorial approach to computational continuum mechanics using object-oriented techniques.” In: Computers in Physics, 12(6): 620–631. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.168744